Thomas Harris, monster-maker
(An extended version of something I wrote for my Writer's Block column
last week in Business Standard)
"In the Green Machine there is no mercy. We make mercy, manufacture it
in the parts that have overgrown our basic reptile brain." - Thomas
Harris, Red Dragon
Genre writers aren't usually held up to very high literary standards:
when was the last time you saw leading critics getting sullen about,
say, Stephen King or John Grisham writing their latest novel (perhaps
their second of the year) with one eye on a subsequent movie
adaptation? Which is why it's noteworthy that so many critics and fans
have protested the Hollywoodisation of Thomas Harris's Hannibal Lecter
books. [The Lecter franchise created by big studios to cash in on the
popularity of Anthony Hopkins's performance in Silence of the Lambs
reached its nadir with the bloated film version of Red Dragon, which
diluted the powerful story by reworking the script to give Lecter a
larger part. It wasn't a movie completely devoid of interest, but it
felt like such a waste given that Michael Mann had made a solid film,
Manhunter, out of that book 15 years earlier - with a great
performance by William Petersen as the haunted Will Graham. Edward
Norton seemed insipid by comparison.]
But then Thomas Harris tends to evoke strong reactions; he isn't seen
as the archetypal popular writer. Oh, he operates within the broad
format of genre fiction alright (the genre in his case being the dark
psychological thriller) - you'll find all the staples of pacy
bestseller writing, the accent on moving the story along, in his work.
But he also takes the reader to places where the usual popular novel
won't go. His attention to detail, the intensity of his narratives and
his talent for plumbing the depths of the soul [editor's note: always
wanted to use that phrase!] - these are things that skirt, dare we
suggest it, Literary territory. Consequently, while his sales don't
quite match those of the King/Grisham/Archer brigade, he has a cult
following that runs deeper, and which includes even heavyweights like
Martin Amis.
Harris was in his 30s when he began his writing career, after having
worked as a crime reporter for a few years. Black Sunday (1975), his
first novel, was a political thriller about a terrorist plot to bomb
the heavily attended Super Bowl final - possibly killing 100,000
people at one go. Michael Lander, a deranged Vietnam veteran and
dirigible expert, becomes the terrorists' instrument for "delivering
death from the sky". Instrument is apt: Lander is more machine than
man himself, past traumas having entirely cauterized his human
feelings. He is also Thomas Harris's first monster, an amoral
sociopath who would prepare the ground for more famous protagonists to
come. Black Sunday feels a little dated today, but it has many of the
concerns that would become associated with Harris's writing: notably
the theme that nature is cruel and unsparing; that primitive,
atavistic impulses are forever boiling just beneath our civilised
exteriors, and that it takes very little for them to come to the
surface.
Of course, these aren't particularly original ideas - Harris himself
often references William Blake, among other writers, who have dealt
with them before - but his treatment of them within the thriller
format is startlingly effective, and never more so than in his second
and best novel, Red Dragon (1981). This is the story of Will Graham,
an investigative agent who reluctantly comes out of retirement to help
trace a psychopath who has murdered two families. Graham has a talent
for getting into a killer's mind, thinking the way he does, and
thereby anticipating his moves. This is not, of course, an
drive is Graham's private conundrum, one that was famously voiced by
Nietzsche: "Battle not with monsters lest ye become a monster." This
is set against the compelling parallel story of Francis Dolarhyde, the
"Red Dragon".
For help in capturing Dolarhyde, Graham turns to another killer he
caught years ago - and thus the Hannibal Lecter legend is born. Harris
gave Hannibal the Cannibal a leading part in his next, most famous
book, The Silence of the Lambs (1988), which became an equally popular
film. And in the florid, over the top Hannibal (1999), Harris handed
the stage almost entirely over to his gentleman monster.
Hannibal is overdone in parts, and disconcertingly different in tone
from anything Harris wrote before it, but much of the criticism it
received was misdirected. The ending, in which Clarice Starling -
epitome of youthful idealism in Silence of the Lambs - becomes the
Monster's Bride, was roundly vilified; Jodie Foster even refused to
play Starling in the movie version of Hannibal because she felt this
went against everything the character stood for. But in fact, Harris
did a fine job of establishing the circumstances that bring about the
change in Clarice's worldview between Silence of the Lambs and
Hannibal, and the change itself is consistent with something that runs
through his work: that people with the strongest commitment to
idealism are also poised most precariously at the edge of insanity.
"We don't invent our natures, Will," Lecter says to Graham in Red
Dragon, "they're issued to us along with our lungs, our pancreas and
everything else." Monsters walk amidst us, says Harris, and there can
be no explanation for why they are what they are. Much of his work is
founded on this idea, and this was partly why his fans felt so let
down by a flashback to Lecter's childhood in Hannibal, which seems to
"explain" his actions. But a closer reading of the book shows that
this isn't the case - Lecter is just as enigmatic, as unknowable, as
ever.
But whether that will remain the case in the next book seems doubtful.
Behind the Mask, about the young Lecter, is due out this year, and
predictably a film version is simultaneously underway. Harris
aficionados (I'm among them) will be hoping the author succeeds in
maintaining at least some of his integrity. Hollywood's Green Machine
No comments:
Post a Comment