harris county driving incarceration

Harris County Driving Incarceration Train

The Texas prison system is full to the brim. Our prisons will exceed

"operational capacity" in fiscal year 2006, meaning starting next

fall, according to the Texas Senate Criminal Justice Committee Interim

Report (pdf).

An internal study last year, cited under Charge 2 in the report (p.

12) explained why:

* Prison release rates declining by 10%

* Parole revocation increasing by 14%

* Probation revocation increasing by 4%

* Pretrial felons in jails increasing by 10%

Bottom line: Texas is revoking more people off of parole and

probation, and letting fewer people out of prison. Now the prisons are

full, and the state must either build a new prison (estimated cost:

$350 million), contract out to expensive private prison systems, or

find some way to reduce the number of people under control of the

criminal justice system.

The Legislative Budget Board's Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team

parsed the numbers for the committee. As usual, Houston is driving the

train. They found that Harris County's community supervision caseload

(the number of people on probation and parole) declined 22.4% over the

past decade, compared to 3.5% in Tarrant (Fort Worth) and 6.2% in

Bexar (San Antonio). In lay terms, that means a greater number of

people are getting "off paper," or ending community supervision.

Sounds good, right? Problem is, the committee reports, statewide about

46% of probation cases end with revocation and incarceration, with

revocation more likely in the big cities: 49% in Harris County, 54% in

Dallas County, and 64% in Tarrant. So half or more of the time,

depending on where you live, offenders wind up incarcerated anyway.

The main culprit? The committee's review "found that revocation of

felons for technical violations has grown by 95% during the period

from 1994 to 2003." That means the offender was sent to prison for

missing meetings with the probation officer or submitting a dirty

urinalysis, not for committing a new crime. Revocations for a new

offense increased just 14% over the same period.

Since probation terms can last up to ten years, that leaves a lot of

time and opportunity for a probationer to slip up. A committee

recommendation to let successful non-violent probationers get "off

paper" after two years was killed by prosecutors in the closing days

of the 78th session.

That leaves the committee faced with the choice of spiraling

incarceration costs or finding smarter solutions: "The occurence of

increasing prison population and decreasing [probation and parole]

population defines the environment that will confront the 79th

Legislature. Legislators will be required to provide resources to

house a larger prison population, redirect portions to alternative

programs, or in some other manner provide for the public safety in

processing the growing offender population." (emphasis added)

For Grits readers not schooled in bureaucratese, what that says is

this: Raise taxes or stop all this tough on crime foolishness,

especially for non-violent and drug offenders.

The Senate Committee's lengthy interim report contains many other

items of interest that Grits will try to sort through in the coming

few days, but these passages give an idea of the big-picture dilemma

faced by the 79th Legislature driving the need for criminal justice