Marc Levin: What should Harris County do now that jail bonds have failed?
Kuff points to an article by Marc Levin of th Texas Public Policy
Foundation in the Houston Chronicle ("How to survive without new
jails," Nov. 17) suggesting alternatives for Harris County officials
after their recent jail bonds failed at the ballot box by a narrow
51-49 margin. Marc's article details many of the most most obvious
solutions to Harris County's jail overcrowding problem:
A new Texas law allows law enforcement officers the discretion to
issue citations, instead of making an arrest, for some of the
lowest-level misdemeanors.
Issuing citations with notices to appear does not reduce the
ultimate punishment for these offenses, which include driving
without a license and possession of an ounce of marijuana, but it
could divert tens of thousands of these pretrial detainees from the
Harris County Jail every year. This also keeps more police on the
beat when officers are spared the three- to four-hour process of
booking a suspect into jail.
The Sheriffs' Association of Texas and the Combined Law Enforcement
Association of Texas both supported this law. While other counties
are successfully implementing it, Harris County District Attorney
Chuck Rosenthal has said he will not prosecute cases in which
police issued citations for such offenses. Law enforcement agencies
and officers in Harris County should be able to exercise the
discretion given to them by the Texas Legislature with confidence
that the citations they issue will be fully prosecuted.
As of Oct. 1, the Harris County Jail's inmate population included
about 1,000 first-time offenders -- more than four times any other
county -- serving sentences for possessing less than a gram of a
controlled substance. A 2003 state law mandates probation for these
state jail felony offenders, but Harris County prosecutors have
instead invoked another law that allows them to reduce the felony
charge to a Class A misdemeanor, which still allows up to one year
of county jail time on local taxpayers' dime.
As of Sept. 20, another 411 inmates in the Harris County Jail
awaited trial on misdemeanors. Many have no prior offenses but
cannot afford to post bail. If the person is not a flight risk,
they should be offered a less costly personal bond. Public safety,
not an offender's financial means, should guide public policy.
Jail overcrowding can also be reduced by offering victim-offender
mediation for first-time, nonviolent property offenders. A survey
of burglary victims found that 81 percent wanted restitution, but
only 41 percent wanted the offender jailed. The victim and the
offender can voluntarily choose to enter an agreement for the
offender to make restitution and perform community service in lieu
of jail time.
It's certainly not for every offender or type of offense, but it
makes sense in cases like graffiti and stealing a compact disc from
a car.
Probation reform can also reduce jail overcrowding. Currently, 43
percent of offenders charged with misdemeanors for first- or
second-time drunk driving choose the Harris County Jail over
probation. As odd as that seems, it allows them to avoid probation
fees and end their case in a month or two instead of two years. One
way to encourage more offenders to choose probation would be to
increase the availability of early termination for probationers who
have fulfilled all their terms and whose conduct has been
exemplary.
Be sure to read the rest because Marc's discussion is exactly the type
of policy debate that should have occurred BEFORE Houston voters were
asked to decide the question. Proposing expensive jail building
projects that require new tax increases, as in Harris and Smith
Counties in earlier this month, should be a last resort, suggested
only after counties, including elected judges and DAs, have used other
tools at their disposal to reduce local overincarceration.
Charles Kuffner summed up the overall message to take from Levin's
column, so rather than seek to come up with a more clever denouement,
I'll end quoting Kuff's observation: "We are not in this situation by
fate. We are in this situation by choice. We can choose to do things
differently, and in doing so we can allocate our scarce resources more
efficiently. It really is that simple."
Let's hope Harris County officials accept that simple message from the
voters as the '08 election season looms before us.
RELATED:
Exploring alternatives to local jail building
* Grits' best practices to reduce county jail overcrowding, Part One
* Grits' best practices to reduce county jail overcrowding, Part Two
* Texans' taxation revulsion vs. their Incarceration Addiction:
Which will prevail on county jail building?
Harris County Jail Overcrowding
* Voters who rejected county jails looking for better justice
policies
* Counties that rejected new jails now must get serious about
diversion
* What they're reading at the Harris County probation department
(series)
* State to Harris County: Pay the piper on overincarceration
* Whitmire: Houston doesn't need more jail beds
* Jailing drug offenders and the interests of justice
* Houston should fix current jails before building more
* Chuck Rosenthal looks vulnerable in '08 Harris County DA's race
HB 2391 - Cite and Summons for Low-level Misdemeanors
* Tuff on crime meet reality at the Nacogdoches County Jail
* Sheriffs more likely than PDs to welcome new arrest discretion
* Jefferson County works out kinks with new cite and summons
authority
* How one Texas county will take advantage of new law to reduce jail
overcrowding
* HB 2391 could save Bexar taxpayers $10,000 per day
* Bexar jail administrator: Stop arrests for nonviolent misdemeanors
* DA Susan Reed blocking key Bexar jail overcrowding solution
* Midland Sheriff's Captain: Cite and summons for low-level offenses
would reduce jail overcrowding
* Cite and summons for low-level offenses could free up jail space
* Texas Lege approved new tools to reduce jail overcrowding, if
police can change their thinking
* DAs thwarting jail overcrowding solutions
No comments:
Post a Comment